Log vs Normal Colour Profile
More dynamic range is only an advantage if something happens to it after the flight.
Researched from published specifications and verified owner reviews · updated 2026
The short answer
A log color profile like D-Log M captures more dynamic range but looks intentionally flat and needs to be graded afterward; shooting log without a grading workflow in place produces worse-looking footage than simply shooting in normal color mode.
Log color profiles exist alongside the rest of the exposure settings covered in drone camera settings for video, and they are one more reason to keep a card rated for the bitrate you actually shoot at, since log footage is commonly captured at the highest available bitrate to preserve as much detail as possible for grading; see the video bitrate and storage chart for what that costs in card space.
Log color profiles exist to capture more of what a camera sensor can actually see, at the cost of a flat, low-contrast image straight out of the camera that needs correction afterward. That trade-off is worth it for anyone with a real grading workflow, and a mistake for anyone without one. This guide covers when each choice is correct, and how to expose and process log footage when you use it.
What log actually captures differently
A normal color profile applies contrast and saturation processing directly in-camera, producing footage that looks close to final straight out of the aircraft, but at the cost of clipping some highlight and shadow detail that the sensor technically captured. A log profile, such as D-Log M on current DJI aircraft, instead compresses that full range of highlight and shadow information into a flatter, less contrasty image, preserving more of it for the editing process rather than discarding it in-camera. The sensor is not capturing more light in an absolute sense; log is simply choosing to preserve more of what it captures rather than committing to a final look at the moment of recording.
Why flat footage is a mistake without a plan
Log footage viewed and delivered exactly as recorded looks washed out, low contrast and desaturated, which is precisely why it is a mistake to shoot log for any job where the footage will be delivered quickly with no time budgeted for grading. A client who receives flat, ungraded log footage reasonably assumes something went wrong with the camera, and correcting that impression after delivery is a worse position than simply shooting in normal color mode in the first place. Log is a deliberate trade of an immediately usable image for more flexibility later; skip it entirely unless that later step is genuinely part of your workflow.
| Factor | Log (D-Log M) | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic range captured | Wider | Narrower, more compressed in-camera |
| Out-of-camera look | Flat, low contrast, needs grading | Close to final |
| Post-production requirement | Grading essential | Optional |
| Best for | High-contrast scenes, planned grading, matching multiple cameras | Fast turnaround, no grading workflow |
| Risk if mishandled | Looks visibly worse than normal if never graded | Lower ceiling but no risk of a flat delivery |
Exposing correctly for log footage
Log footage on a standard preview monitor looks noticeably darker and flatter than it actually is, which leads new users to overexpose in an attempt to make it look right in the field. The correct approach is closer to the opposite: expose slightly brighter than looks natural on the screen, a technique often called exposing to the right, because log profiles retain more recoverable detail in the brighter part of the exposure range than in deep shadow. Pulling detail back down from a slightly bright exposure in the grade produces a cleaner result than trying to lift detail out of shadows that were underexposed in the field.
LUTs: a fast starting point, not a requirement
A LUT, or look-up table, applies a preset color transformation to flat log footage, quickly pushing it toward a normal contrast and saturation range either as a finished look or as a starting point for further manual grading. LUTs are not required to work with log footage, but they remove a significant amount of manual color correction work, especially for someone still building grading skill. Many editing applications include at least a basic log-to-normal LUT, and manufacturer-provided LUTs matched to a specific camera's log profile tend to produce more accurate starting results than a generic one.
Matching color across multiple cameras
Aerial footage is frequently cut against ground camera footage from a different camera system entirely, and matching color between the two is significantly easier with a physical reference. Shoot the Datacolor SpyderCheckr 24 colour chart once under the same lighting as your subject, on both the drone and any ground camera in use, and use it in the grade as a shared reference point for matching white balance and color response between the two systems. This single step often saves more grading time than any other single technique when cutting drone and ground footage together.
Datacolor
Datacolor SpyderCheckr 24 colour chart
24 patch chart plus grey card
Shoot it once per lighting setup on both the drone and ground camera, then match both to the same reference chart in the grade instead of matching by eye.
Prices move constantly. We earn a commission if you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Grading log footage: a practical starting workflow
A reasonable first grading pass on log footage follows a consistent order rather than adjusting settings randomly until something looks right. Start by applying a LUT or a basic contrast and saturation correction to bring the image roughly back to a normal-looking baseline, since judging color and exposure decisions against a genuinely flat image is difficult even for an experienced editor. From that baseline, correct white balance and overall exposure first, since every subsequent adjustment depends on those being roughly right. Only after exposure and white balance are settled should more creative adjustments, such as a specific color look or selective saturation changes, be layered on top. Attempting creative grading choices before the base exposure and white balance are corrected tends to produce a result that looks fine in isolation but falls apart the moment it is compared against other correctly graded clips in the same edit.
Matching multiple clips from the same flying session to each other, before matching across different sessions or different cameras entirely, keeps the grading process manageable. Group clips by lighting condition first, since a batch shot under consistent overcast light generally grades together easily with one set of adjustments, while clips spanning changing light conditions across a longer session need individual attention regardless of how similar the raw footage might look at first glance.
A note on bit depth and codec, which affect log more than normal
Log footage benefits more from a higher bit depth codec than normal color footage does, because grading a flat image involves stretching contrast and color back out, and doing that math on a lower bit depth source is more likely to reveal visible banding, especially in smooth gradients like a sky at sunset. If your aircraft offers a choice between an 8-bit and a 10-bit recording mode, prefer 10-bit specifically when shooting log, even at the cost of a lower maximum bitrate or frame rate in some cameras' mode combinations. Normal color footage, since it needs far less aggressive correction afterward, tolerates 8-bit recording with much less visible penalty, which is one more practical reason the decision between log and normal is not purely a stylistic one; it has real downstream technical consequences for how much room the footage has to survive editing.
Deciding which to use, in practice
Shoot normal color for fast-turnaround jobs, footage that will not be graded, and any situation where a client expects same-day or next-day delivery. Shoot log when the scene has genuinely high dynamic range, such as a bright sky against a shadowed foreground, when the footage needs to match ground camera footage shot in log, or when a real grading pass is already part of the project timeline. For the exposure and shutter fundamentals that apply regardless of which profile you choose, see drone camera settings for video, and for the cinematography moves that benefit most from a properly graded image, see cinematic drone moves. Browse the best drones for video creators roundup for aircraft that shoot log natively if you are choosing a camera drone with grading in mind.
Questions people ask
+ What does a log color profile actually do?
A log profile, such as D-Log M, captures a wider dynamic range by compressing highlight and shadow information into a flatter, lower-contrast image than what the sensor is capable of showing directly. That flat image is not the final look; it is raw material meant to be corrected and graded afterward in editing software.
+ Should a beginner shoot in log or normal color mode?
Normal color, usually in most situations. Log footage that is never graded looks worse than normal footage straight out of the camera, flat and washed out, and grading log correctly requires understanding exposure and using a proper grading workflow. Shoot normal until you have a specific editing workflow set up to handle log footage.
+ How should I expose when shooting in a log profile?
Expose slightly brighter than looks correct on the monitor, sometimes described as exposing to the right, because log footage holds more recoverable detail in the highlights than in deep shadow, and log footage generally looks underexposed on a standard preview screen even when the actual exposure is correct.
+ What is a LUT and do I need one?
A LUT, or look-up table, is a preset color transformation applied to log footage to quickly bring it toward a normal, viewable contrast and color range, either as a starting point for further grading or as a fast final look. A LUT is not required to grade log footage, but it saves significant time over grading from a completely flat starting point.
+ When is shooting flat actually a mistake?
When there is no plan to grade the footage afterward, when the footage needs to be delivered quickly with no post-production time budgeted, or when the shooter has not tested their specific grading workflow before a paid job. Log footage delivered flat, ungraded, to a client is a common and entirely avoidable mistake.
+ Can I mix log and normal footage from the same aircraft in one project?
Yes, but it takes extra care in the edit to match them, since log and normal footage carry very different contrast and saturation straight out of the camera. It is usually simpler to pick one profile per project and stay consistent, switching only if a specific shot genuinely needs the extra dynamic range log provides.
